Member-only story

We Need a Healthy Conversation About Allowing Prisoners to Vote.

What voting rights could mean for the imprisoned population.

Lauren Elizabeth
3 min readApr 28, 2019
Photo via Larry Farr on Unsplash

The discussion surrounding prisons and how to tackle criminal justice reform overall has been an important and necessary part of political debate, and has come to the heart of the conversation in recent days. During a recent CNN town hall, Bernie Sanders raised eyebrows with his bold and controversial position that yes, he would allow the Boston bomber to vote. Predictably, this statement ignited fierce pushback to the idea. In the sensationalized response to Bernie’s answer, the larger point and what he was trying to address might unfortunately be getting lost in the discourse.

By stating that he would allow the Boston bomber to vote, Bernie was telling the audience that yes, he stood by his principled view that he would allow ALL prisoners and ex prisoners to vote, regardless of their crimes.

By conflating all of the country’s incarcerated population with the likes of the Boston bomber, we are doing an enormous disservice to the discussion by allowing people to forget the fact that there are thousands upon thousands of people behind bars for crimes like drug offenses. There are people doing life without the possibility of parole for nonviolent drug offenses. Obviously, the…

--

--

Lauren Elizabeth
Lauren Elizabeth

Written by Lauren Elizabeth

Lauren is a writer & leftist with analysis on topics related to politics & policy. She can be reached at LaurenMartinchek@gmail.com or Twitter @xlauren_mx

Responses (3)